Mr
Paul Krugman in his book The
Great Unraveling (W.W. Norton, New York, 2003) got ahead of
the reality and in the cold clear light of the morning (NY Times
columns, that is) he noticed repeatedly (more than 369 times, see
below), while cooking his books, that Mr George W. Bush was called
by the revolution- ary Devil to lead the nation out of the long
national nightmare of peace and prosperity. Am I overstating the
case? In fact, there’s ample evidence:
The
book has 426 pages, in this imperfect world, but some of them are
not guilty. When I exclude 20 empty pages in-between the chapters,
18 index pages, and 60 pages written before the year 2000 (when
Krugman was ahead of the Asian curve and was busy consult- ing for
Enron, the most celebrated company for its "aggressive
accounting", the art form formerly known as fraud), and I
include 15 preface pages (with Roman numerals), it comes to 343
relevant pages. On these 343 pages, Mr Bush, by his name, is
mentioned 369 times. Nor is even that the whole story: through these
pages Mr Bush appears with roughly the same frequency under
"president elect", "president", "the
administration", or simply "he". Then, there are
other crucial ingredients, like some dozen pages devoted to Dick
Cheney who is not as bad as Mr Bush, but bad nevertheless.
The
book is a compilation of the columns written for the NY Times
between January 2000 and January 2003, plus some earlier Nobel Prize
achievements. In the preface, Mr Krugman hopes that readers will
find that the sum is more than the whole of its parts - that taken
together these columns tell a coherent story. So, I did a sort of
summary, above. And so it has turned out. I’m not sure that it is
a coherent story, but I’m not sure that it isn’t.
Need
I say more? A book like this gives me the chills down my spine.
There is a good case to be made that the dinosaurs died out of fear
when they realized that mere 600 million years are left before Mr
Bush’s presi- dency. They had no idea that what they do need to
fear is fear itself. (Note: drawing parallels does not mean claiming
moral equivalence. But don’t get me