|
[MAP1] [MAP2]. On average, it invokes 2.1 % of monthly hits, 6.9 % of monthly visits and, even more impressively, it represents 31 % of entry pages. On CLP heydays, in May of 2009, 90 % of all entry pages were CLP (!!) when CLP constituted 16.6 % of all pages visited. The monthly visiting rate variations follow the general pattern, low summer months rates that is, but even more pronounced: while general rates are typically halved in summer, SLP entry pages go down by a factor of roughly four. In the analysis GR website in 2009, I’ve already commented that CLP is an ‘evergreen’ not easy to explain. At first I thought it’s Andy Rooney’s popularity but then I realized that CLP hits are rooted in keywords cereal labels, food labels, food ingredients, and likewise. Unfortunately, CLP does not bring an informative text on the related subject(s), so most visitors are probably disappointed and leave immediately - the assessment supported by the fact that the number of CLP exit pages is practically identical to CLP entry pages, the difference does not go higher than 0.1 % (!!). So, why CLP stays evergreen? It must be a flaw in the web search engines. I imagine the following scenario: In the spring of 2008 food labels became hot social issue. At that time, however, web is not rich on the subject and visitors are herded to my website, to CLP. Most visitors are disappointed, of course, but the visits do count for the search engine’s ranking - and here we go, misleading browsing directions grow ever happier. It’s not fair to visitors and it’s not fair to me either, I don’t like being fooled by the false appeal of my website. If a page visit is below 10 or so seconds, a search engine should not count it as visit for the ranking purposes. That’s it. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WEBSITE EDITOR: |
|
|