I
am beautiful, I am strong, I am wise,
I
am good. And I discovered it all!
Stanislaw
Jerzy Lec in Unkempt Thoughts (1957)
American
publishing industry is flooded out with biographies, autobiographies
and memoirs. So are journals. And the flooding accelerates. Even
daily newspapers carry very personalized reports, not to mention
open-ed columns. I dislike it, I dislike it very much. I’m also
annoyed by the abundance of quotes in a subject oriented text and
direct discourse in nonfiction writings. Moreover, in recent years
most authors in The Best American Essays, an annual from Best
American series I enjoy reading, write predominantly about
themselves. As I said, I disfavor them. So I feel somehow pleased if
not encouraged in my attitude by the comments in the 2012 annual by
David Brooks (the book editor) and Robert Atwan (the series editor):
they both long for the old days when essays were written on topics,
the essays which nevertheless were personal essays being based on an
individual perspective. Essayists of the old days liked to "examine -
or, to use an essayist favorite term, consider - topics from
various perspectives", says Robert Arwan in his foreword.
Favorable,
promising signs? I doubt it. Look how Brooks and Atwan start out
their writings:
David
Brooks, in his Introduction: "When
I was an undergrad at the University of Chicago, I attended classes
with a moderate degree of diligence, but ..."
Robert
Atwan in his Foreword: Of Topics: "Whenever
I get into discussions about the essay with creative writing
students, I discover a peculiar notion they have about ..."
Got
it? This is a story of overreach. There’s evidence, and there’s
bulldust. |
|