olympic
medals, making a sense of
In
the aftermath of London’s Olympic games 2012, I’m annoyed by
their use as a vehicle for nationalism. The way results of the
Olympic games are officially presented is to rank countries by the
number of medals - gold, silver, and bronze, sorting done in that
order. A justification of it invokes two questions: (1) are rules of
sorting purposeful, and (2) do medals relate to some country’s
vital parameters?
Rules
of sorting. The current rules are
misleading. While it is true that gold medal has to be valued more,
it’s counterproductive to impose the primary sorting by gold
medals only. For instance, Norway with 2 gold, 1 silver, and 1
bronze is ranked ahead of Canada with 1 gold, 5 silver, and 12
bronze. Let me suggest a ranking by olympic points calculated from
the number of medals as
olympic
points = (gold x 4) + (silver x 2) + (bronze x 1)
You
may consider steeper stratification of the medals but even this
modest one, binary, moves Canada up for fifteen places(!),
definitely in front of Norway. Compare the ranking by points, in a green
frame, with the ranking by gold medals.
Medals
vs country’s parameters. I’ve
explored relationship of olympic points (rather then medals) to
country’s population size, gross domestic product (GDP), gross
domestic product at purchasing power parity (GDPppp) per capita,
general education, tertiary education, health expenditures as % of
GDP, health performance and human development index (HDI); enclosed
here are four graphs. A general
statement: there’s no correlation, none whatsoever. Then again,
why would anyone expect a correlation at all? Jamaica’s
magnificent sprinters definitely are not related to country’s
population size or GDP or education or health insurance. Are medals
really so expensive for an average citizen of Switzerland, Norway
and Ireland?
Olympic
games are the days of pleasant unimportance. They are, after all,
only games. They are a competition among sportsmen, profession- als
mostly, not countries. Wait, did I mention a political significance? |
CLICK
ON THE TABLE OR GRAPHS
TO ENLARGE
|