Lost
conscience. I did not expect that my views and feelings of
Stalingrad would coincide with those of field-marshal Erich von
Manstein (1887-1973), Hitler’s most brilliant general, the
commander of German Southern Army Group at the time of the
Stalingrad battle. I did expect a high military profes- sionalism in
his war memoirs Verlorene Siege (1955; English translation Lost
Victories, 1958), maybe some new angle, different from the
victors’ account. However, it stuck me how insensible he is to
the aims of his actions and to human suffering from his actions.
How
dares von Manstein to compare Stalingrad with Thermopylae: Greeks
at Thermopylae in 480 BC were defending native soil against the
invading Persian Empire while Germans at Stalingrad in 1943 were
defending their own skin after being encircled, as invaders,
thousands kilometers deep into Russian soil. Besides, von Paulus,
the commander of the German Sixth Army at Stalingrad, and his
Germans did not match the moral strength of Leonidas and his
Spartans at Thermopylae, exactly because they didn’t fight a
patriotic last stand.
Interestingly
enough, von Manstein, the brilliant general who claims that if
the generals had been in charge of strategy instead of Hitler, the
war on the Eastern front could have been won, shows a lot of pride
for his own "bleeding from a thousand wounds" escape
from the encircling.
And
why the generals had a winning hand (as compared to Hitler)?
Because they were artists, they destroyed other peoples’ lives
and achievements in an artistic manner, not only efficient but
also pleasing manner.
Did
von Manstein ever ask himself what 1,080,000 Russian mothers and
405,409 German mothers were thinking of his art from July 1943 to
January 1944? |
|