|
|
|
It
came to my attention that while I was addressing anomalies and
abnormalities of countries chess rating [WEEKLY],
ChessBase website tackled another very arguable chess topic:
who was (is) the best chess player of all time? The two articles by
Jeff Sonas are worth reading, and they crest in seven praiseworthy
graphical presentations. Here is an excerpt from Sona’s
introduction to the first article:
With Garry Kasparov announcing his retirement last month, it seems
like an appropriate time to look back on his career and compare it
with the careers of other all-time greats, to try to place him in
some kind of historical context. The obvious question at this point
is: was Garry Kasparov the most dominant chess player of all time?
And if not, who was?
Of course, there is no clear answer; it is a question that can be
interpreted many different ways, and most of the answers are
extremely subjective. First of all, I am not trying to produce any
sort of definitive statement about whose actual chess skill was
greatest, or strongest, or most artistic. I'm not looking at the
moves they made; I am only looking at overall game outcomes (win,
lose, or draw), and drawing conclusions from analysis of those
outcomes. I have developed several different "metrics" for
exploring this issue objectively, and I would like to share some of
them with you. It’s an entertaining topic, and even if you think
the question is ultimately meaningless, I hope that you will
nevertheless enjoy the ride.
|
|